What cam?

Discussion in 'Technical' started by Comet-73, Jan 31, 2006.

  1. Comet-73

    Comet-73 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    lethbridge AB Canada
    Vehicle:
    73 comet gt, 76 comet 4 door, 71 Maverick 200/I6
    Thanks for the advise even tho this did get a little off topic. here is my expirence i have had both sigle and duel plane i like my single much more then my duel the power just sort of drop off near the top end. this is not my daily driver and gas is no object for me.

    P.s. i order the 268h cam& lifters, the springs and retainers were only and extra $65(some kinda deal or something) so i picked up both i also order some stronger push rods.

    Oh yeah not a big fan of eldelbrock i like there intakes but they make junk carbs. once i got my holley the eldlebrock went straight into the garbage damn near cut a 1/3 off my 1/4 (thats with out tunning the holley yeat as well)
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2006
  2. Andysutt

    Andysutt '72 Comet GT

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    112
    Location:
    Conway Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1972 Comet GT
    I'll second the E201421 "Hi Flow 1h" Erson cam. Im running this cam currently. Pu tit in 4 degrees advanced and it helps out the bottom end alot
     
  3. ATOMonkey

    ATOMonkey Adam

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2005
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    75
    Location:
    Plainfield, Indiana
    Vehicle:
    '69 & 1/2 Maverick
    Check your spring pressure on the new springs. I don't know what the limit of the pressed in studs is, but I always put in screw in studs while I'm putting in new springs. One less thing for me to worry about. It's better than tossing a lifter and losing oil pressure at 5,000 rpm. Only needed to do that once.
     
  4. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    If we are on the subject of Erson, the TQ 20 was a heck of a cam for me with a mild single plane, stock-ish heads, and C4. It gave way more torque than a light car like the Maverick could get to the ground, even when I had 3.00 gears in it.
    I remember one time at the local AutoZone, some of the counter guys came out and were commenting that the car surely had no torque with a stock C4, 3.00s, and a single plane... I demonstrated otherwise in the parking lot. No power braking, just throttle. ;)
    They re-thought the whole 'no single plane on the street' rule.
    Our cars are just too light to worry with dual planes.
    I am like you... My single plane had more torque than I could use, and the RPM choked after 4k or so. Just went flat.
    Dave


    Btw: TQ20 = 478 lift/214 duration
    Right at the limit for stock studs and rockers.
    I used all out stock heads, and probably would recommend the same unless you are determined.
    Nice steady lope at idle, however very subdued. It's not a huge cam.
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2006

Share This Page