how to make a factory 289 pull some muscle...

Discussion in 'Technical' started by h2o, Feb 28, 2009.

  1. h2o

    h2o Mad Mav Man

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    mexico city
    Vehicle:
    1973 ford maverick gt 289 v8
    hi everybody
    can anybody tell me how do i make the original 289 with the original 4 speed tranny of my 73 mav pull some muscle? i mean its not like it's been outrun by sentras but recently i drove a friend's jetta gli and i was overwhelmed, i know that's a turbo car, but i have a v8! it's 3 cylinders and a lot of cubic inches more so i'm guessing it should be faster than it is now. thank you!:thumbs2:
     
  2. rthomas771

    rthomas771 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,092
    Likes Received:
    981
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    GA
    Vehicle:
    '74 Maverick 302 5-Speed.'60 Falcon V8. '63.5 Falcon HT
    Put more gear under it. No more than a 600 cfm carb. 1.94 intake 1.60 exhaust valves or aftermarket heads
     
  3. Bryant

    Bryant forgot more than learned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,538
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    71 Maverick
    if your 73s motor is orignal then its a 302. if its all stock then there is alot you need to do to get it to make the power and feel you want. i would recomend geting a kit that includes a cam shaft, cylinder heads, intake manifold, and carb. something like the edelbrock performer rpm kit. get a set of headers. regear the rear to 3.55s and put a posi in it. all this will make your car a realy fast fun car to drive and should easly beat any jetta
     
  4. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    You look at the engines and think your car should be faster - Look at the difference in weight between the two cars and the rear gear ratios.
    As mentioned you have a 302 smog engine with low compression and minimal power. A kit that replaces the cam, heads, intake and carb will add some power and a lower rear gear will make better use of the power but you will still have the extra weight. You need about 1 hp for every 10 pounds of extra weight to make it perform the same - so add the power and enjoy the car.
     
  5. h2o

    h2o Mad Mav Man

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    mexico city
    Vehicle:
    1973 ford maverick gt 289 v8
    the engine is a 289 as far as i know, i think here in mexico 73's got out with both engines. is there a way to difference them? i'll post a photo of it soon.
    thank you for all your recommendations so i'm taking it will handle all those mods with no trouble at all? the transmition is the original also. i'm not planning on getting rid of any of the stuff in the interior for a loss of weight, but maybe some of the stuff you've already told me come in aluminum?
    thanks guys!
     
  6. rthomas771

    rthomas771 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,092
    Likes Received:
    981
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    GA
    Vehicle:
    '74 Maverick 302 5-Speed.'60 Falcon V8. '63.5 Falcon HT
    The only real way to know is measure the stroke. Remove a spark plug, find TDC and insert a long stiff wire in the cylinder and turn the engine by hand. 3" is 302...2.87" is 289
     
  7. markso125

    markso125 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    1,714
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    117
    Location:
    Lewiston Ut
    Vehicle:
    1972 maverick 2 door LDO
    They have different Jetta's then we do here just like the 5 cylinder turbocharged Focus's, the boss 260 motors, the Volkswagon scorroco or the Fiat Bravo that we will never see due to the EPA or the NHTSA. Look at all the problems Ford is having just bringing some of their european models to the US.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2009
  8. h2o

    h2o Mad Mav Man

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    mexico city
    Vehicle:
    1973 ford maverick gt 289 v8
    yeah the jetta is 5cil turbo, and we have the 5cil turbo focus, great machine by the way!
     
  9. Bryant

    Bryant forgot more than learned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,538
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    71 Maverick
    the same recomendations will work on a 289 or 302. the edelbrock performer rpm kit uses alum. heads and alum intake. should elimnate at least 50lbs from the front of the car
     
  10. h2o

    h2o Mad Mav Man

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    mexico city
    Vehicle:
    1973 ford maverick gt 289 v8
    does anybody know how many hp does the 289 mav had from factory, the engine begs for a shift up at 4000rpm i don't know if that's something relevant or not.
     
  11. Bryant

    Bryant forgot more than learned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,538
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    71 Maverick
    there is no realy way for us to know what a mexican maverick with a 289 was rated at. the reason it wont rev past 4000 rpm very well is that the valve springs are worn out. if you replace them you will gain alot of top end power.
     
  12. h2o

    h2o Mad Mav Man

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    mexico city
    Vehicle:
    1973 ford maverick gt 289 v8
    hey thanks! that's really useful info i'm gonna change them, i'd really like to rev the engine more, i know it has so much to give.:rofl:
     
  13. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    Ford did not produce 289 engines after 1967.
    The 302 and 289 use a block that looks the same from the outside the difference is in the crankshaft, rods and pistons.
    You have a 302.
     
  14. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    To make the engine rev higher you will need to do some head work, a new cam, a better intake and larger carb.
     
  15. h2o

    h2o Mad Mav Man

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2005
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    76
    Location:
    mexico city
    Vehicle:
    1973 ford maverick gt 289 v8
    i can't possibly refute that because i honestly don't know, just remember mexico's ford did a lot of things with mavericks that the u.s. ford didn't, a.k.a. shelby maverick?
    anyways it doesn't matter much to me if it's a 302 or a 289 what i really care is that is beats on the street, and i'm hands on it!
     

Share This Page