Falcon VS Comet / Maverick

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by Cpt. Bondo, Dec 17, 2011.

  1. Cpt. Bondo

    Cpt. Bondo Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    630
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    67
    Location:
    Summerville, South Carolina
    Vehicle:
    (2) '72 Comet GTs, 68 Mustang
    After purchasing the October issue of Modified Mustangs and Fords magazine that had the article on Terri's beautiful Maverick in it, I started reading the article on the buildup of their Ford Falcon. In it and the January issue there are several interesting suspention modifications being done to the Falcon.

    What I am wondering is just how much of the information contained in the articles would apply to our cars since they are based off of the Falcon platform?

    They show a 4 link rear suspention set up being installed in the January issue with a bolt in shock mount that would solve the weak upper shock mount problem!

    -Scott H.
     
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2011
  2. krelboyne

    krelboyne Remember

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2006
    Messages:
    896
    Likes Received:
    87
    Trophy Points:
    115
    Location:
    Salem, Oregon
    The last US version Falcon, was a 1970-1/2, it was built on the Torino or 'B' body platform.

    I thought that the Maverick replaced the Falcon in name, as the budget economy car in the 1970 Ford lineup.
     
  3. Dave B

    Dave B I like Mavericks!

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    16,931
    Likes Received:
    215
    Trophy Points:
    347
    Location:
    Parts Unknown......
    Vehicle:
    3 Grabbers
    From what I seen, and asked a few people, the Maverick rear frame rail doesn't have the same curve or dimensions as the Falcon. Jeff would be the one to tell us for sure.
     
  4. rthomas771

    rthomas771 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    8,080
    Likes Received:
    969
    Trophy Points:
    498
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    GA
    Vehicle:
    '74 Maverick 302 5-Speed.'60 Falcon V8. '63.5 Falcon HT
    Dave is correct about the frame rail curve and dimension being different. I don't know if this will play a part in not making the aftermarket parts fit a Maverick out of the box. But what will be different is the Falcon has a boxed structural between the frame rails where the shocks mount whereas the Maverick mount bolts to the floor pan. The Falcon is 37-7/16" wide between the frame rails at the front spring mount and the Maverick is 37".

    I don't know the kit you were reading about in the magazine but when I was at Rod & Custom shop in SC a few years ago installing their kit in a 65 Falcon we welded it to the frame. Kinda like frame rail connectors...they can be bolt-on but weld-on are better and can't move.

    1st pic is my Maverick top shock mount...2nd pic is my Falcon.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Cpt. Bondo

    Cpt. Bondo Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    630
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    67
    Location:
    Summerville, South Carolina
    Vehicle:
    (2) '72 Comet GTs, 68 Mustang
    Thanks, that was one of the main things I was wondering about.

    The kit in the article is made by TCI and is listed to fit the '60 - '65 Falcon, '62 - '65 Comet, and '60 - '65 Ranchero. From the looks of it, part of the mounting system bolts to the Falcon shock mounts so that part definately will not work with our cars.

    Oh well, I was hoping we had another neat part available for our cars but I guess it's back to the drawing board.

    -Scott H.
     

Share This Page