Aluminum Heads

Discussion in 'Technical' started by MikeG747, Jan 29, 2006.

  1. MikeG747

    MikeG747 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,516
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick Grabber, 347 4V w/F-1X, 1974 Maverick Grabber 302 4V, 1974 Maverick Grabber 302 2V, 1971 Maverick Grabber 302 4V.
    My 74 Mav Grabber has stock 302 with the exception of 4 bbl, dual exhaust & MSD Distributor. My question is this. Is it practical to put Aftermarket Aluminum Heads on a daily driver? It's not really a daily driver. I drive it to work about 1 day a week (1/2 hour each way) just for fun. I would just like it to have a little more get up & go!:drive: If I change the Heads do I have to change anything else, Lifters, Push Rods, etc.? If this is feasible what heads do you guys recommend?
     

    Attached Files:

    • t11.jpg
      t11.jpg
      File size:
      69.9 KB
      Views:
      34
    • G6.jpg
      G6.jpg
      File size:
      90.6 KB
      Views:
      52
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2006
  2. Rick Book

    Rick Book Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    5,744
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    197
    Location:
    Thailand
    Vehicle:
    Missing my old '70 Maverick
    That's a broad question with many possible answers.

    First off, what is your budget? How much, and not a penny more, do you have to spend on go-fast equip?

    Will you be doing the work yourself? Do you have enough experience/tools to do the job yourself?

    How quick do you want to go? Will you be racing it at the track? 1/8th mile? 1/4 Mile?

    What gears do you have now?


    I'm not trying to be a smarty-pants, but Fast=$. How much you have to spend is going to help determine what's the best bang for your buck. At some point, you get deminishing returns.

    AFR 185 heads used = ~ $1000-$1200. Then you'll want hardened push rods, aftermarket roller rockers, headers to let the heads exhaust, sufficiently sized carb to feed 'em, better flowing intake to let more air in, and so on and so on and so on.

    But again, the first question is how much do you have to spend on go-fast parts?

    Maybe a simple gear change will be sufficient for now. :huh:
     
    Last edited: Jan 29, 2006
  3. Zooomzoomguy

    Zooomzoomguy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Detroit, MI
    Vehicle:
    73 maverick, 2 door
    i heard good things about some aftermarket cast iron heads too
     
  4. MikeG747

    MikeG747 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    Messages:
    1,516
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Vehicle:
    1973 Maverick Grabber, 347 4V w/F-1X, 1974 Maverick Grabber 302 4V, 1974 Maverick Grabber 302 2V, 1971 Maverick Grabber 302 4V.
    Rick I answered your questions above. I understand your point. I want this car to be very streetable. I will not be running it at the strip. I just want to make a nice improvement in it's performance. I was hopeing the Aluminum Heads would be a good streetable addition. I have a 73 Grabber that I'm thinking of making Street/Strip.
     
  5. CornedBeef4.6L

    CornedBeef4.6L no longer here

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2003
    Messages:
    5,217
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    137
    Vehicle:
    no longer here
    You can build a car that can drive any where and still go fast. Mavaholic, Riporter, myself, and many others here all have fast,reliable, and very streetable cars. It comes down to being smart in your selection of parts. Build it to make power from 1500rpm to approx 7k. A good set of heads and valvetrain components, Compression around 10to1 to 11to1 and a cam to use in that workable rpm range. Just throwing a set of aluminum heads on will leave you disappointed. It is a package type deal. A purpose built motor. Otherwise I agree a set of gears would help 3.40s to 3.55s. FWIW I will fire mine up and head any where any time. I run in the 12s. Dennis' and Ricks cars run very similiar numbers and I am fairly sure those two will drive any where too. But they can pipe in for themselves...:)
     
  6. tim keck

    tim keck truckdrivintrailertrash

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    1,991
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    111
    Location:
    sharps chapel,Tn
    Vehicle:
    '72 Comet, '75 Maverick, '85 F150 4x4 ,'93 F150,'75 F100,'77 Jeep Wagoneer,'91 Dodge D250 Cummins,'90 F150 xtra cab 4x4, '93 F150 4x4
    Most OE engines have run aluminum heads for years now so the material isn't an issue.But for mild performance upgrade just grab a set of E7's or some GT-40's & slap 'em on.But as Lance said,it's a package deal,you just can't throw parts at it without looking at how they work with each other.The E7 & GT-40 heads should work well with your limited mods and can be found used reasonably cheap.
     
  7. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    I will buck the trend here...
    Aluminum heads will remove a little weight from the car and can handle a little increase in compression without increasing octane.
    I am not saying that you will be satisfied with the difference while keeping your 2.79 gears. However there are positives to hauling around less weight and bumping up compression a bit with small chambers.
    Put it in perspective: Iron heads with no other changes = small increase with same weight and compression.
    Aluminum heads with no other changes = small increase with an increase from less weight and a decent bump in compression. Not to mention a slight economy increase from weight loss.
    Then, if you intend to make other changes as well, the aluminum heads just magnify that further or give room to make more changes later.
    Just my .02
    Dave
     
  8. streetrod77

    streetrod77 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,266
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    100
    Location:
    Memphis,Tenn
    Vehicle:
    77 comet
    I'm with the others on here. It needs to be a complete package. I have GT40 iron heads. The heads alone did a little but with a better cam & 3.55 gears & posi unit & Airgap intake & 600 carb, I thought I had a new car. Huge difference over stock. If you get a good set of heads than the cam has to have enough lift to get you in the airflow of the head.
     
  9. Tom Laskowski

    Tom Laskowski Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    917
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Bay Area,California
    Vehicle:
    (3) 71's,two V-8's and one 200 cid
    My two cents is , a good tune up, and a set of 3:55 gears, done deal!
     
  10. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    My two cents, if you do regular interstate highway driving, I wouldn't touch those gears...leave the 2.79 in there. I could still break my open 2.79 gears loose with the original all-stock (except for intake) motor. But even the 2.79 was a little uncomfortable on the highway with high rpms at 70mph. If this car is not going to see the track, I would leave the gears alone.

    It seems that you could still do some really nice modifications to the motor, and still take off pretty fast, but you would never live down the gear change if you are doing regular highway driving.

    Now, if you even do a little racing, go with 3.55, still not screaming down the highway, but quicker takeoff. I have 3.80 and do interstate driving, but I seldom go over 60mph, in a 70 speed zone. I don't like running the car at 3750-4000rpm for long periods of highway driving, but I DO like to take off really fast. I can get to 80 mph in around 5-6 seconds, but I don't stay there for long. I can pass that Mustang up pretty quick, but then, after showing off (just to keep him on his toes) I then back down to 60-ish and just take my time.

    I don't think you want to drive like that if you do regular highway driving. A gear change would eat you up.
     
  11. Earl Branham

    Earl Branham Certified Old Fart

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    6,367
    Likes Received:
    201
    Trophy Points:
    218
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    Lugoff, SC
    Vehicle:
    '69.5 Maverick 302, T-5, Grabber Green
    I dumped a 3:55 in favor of a 3:00, just for that reason. I do a lot of highway driving in my car, and the 3:55 will spin the engine up too much. No sense wearing it out before its time.
     
  12. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    There are times when I wished I would have bought a second rearend, or center unit, and swapped them on days I raced. I used to race maybe 4-6 times per year, until my local track closed down. I really wish I still had the 2.79, then I could just swap them out a couple times a year, especially now that ALL my driving is highway and some in-town stuff. I have to admit, the 3.80 posi is kinda nice for some of the in-town stuff, especially taking off from red lights :evilsmile
     
  13. sierra grabber

    sierra grabber Certifiable

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    2,808
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    northern nevada
    Vehicle:
    71 grabber red and black; 74 2dr LDO comet
    I was very iffy on this myself, several of my friends finally convinced me that well made aluminum heads will disipate heat better and wont flex as much as cast heads. that played more of a factor in my switching to trick flows than just the flow numbers and chamber size. of course that all still factored in, but im definately not taking full advantage with a radical cam because i do plan to drive it on the highway.
     
  14. scooper77515

    scooper77515 No current projects.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    14,672
    Likes Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    233
    Location:
    Issaquah/Grand Coulee, WA
    Vehicle:
    Fresh out of Mavericks
    If I could do it all over again, I would go for the best heads I could buy the first time. In my case the GT40Ps are about what I can afford, but I would have done them sooner. Even if I did not see the improvements with the heads, I would have seen them with the other modifications. I am a tinkerer, and I love to mess with things, or replace things, and see what kind of improvements I get. If I had better heads to begin with, I would have had better results from my projects, and I would have bought higher-performance parts the first time. Since my heads were stock, I knew that high-dollar intakes, cams, etc. were not going to show me much gain, so I bought mid-range parts.

    I wish I had the head-flow to begin with so that I would have gotten parts that were a little more high-performance the first time around. I feel like it is setting a better platform to start building on.
     
  15. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    I just noticed that you say "money is not an issue"...
    If so, get your 3.80-4.11 gears with locker, then put a Gear Vendor on your tranny.
    You can have your cake and eat it too.
    Just switch the O/D on when you get on the highway, off when you get on the street.
    Dave

    Edit: I should tell you though that you wouldn't want a gear unless you had a cam to match your new heads. Otherwise you would rev out of your cam's rpm range too fast and you would get the sensation of driving a truck rather than a fast car.
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2006

Share This Page