351w build input....

Discussion in 'Technical' started by mean_maverick, Jun 12, 2009.

  1. mean_maverick

    mean_maverick Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,312
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Irvine, Kentucky
    Vehicle:
    '73 4dr
    been gathering parts for my 351w build and was planning on a 10.5 CR with flat tops but recently found a good deal on a used set of TRW forged units with dish tops, which puts the CR around 9.4 or better (depending on heads). i plan on running around town in this car but it's going to see some track time and might be my new bracket car.

    so here's the good and bad:
    flat tops= higher compression, but i wont run nitrous with these
    dish tops= lower compression, but have capability of nitrous and/or boost


    engine specs:
    std 4.000" bore
    3.500" stroke
    factory crank
    cnc steel i-beam rods
    thinking about the x303 cam with .542 lift 286* duration

    still shopping around on the heads but looking for the 195cc head, 1.94/1.60 valves but chamber is going to be around the 60cc range

    intake is in the lines of a performer rpm or maybe an air-gap




    so all in all, any have any opinions as to piston recommendations? any input is always greatly appreciated
     
  2. Bryant

    Bryant forgot more than learned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,538
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    71 Maverick
    why couldnt you use nitrous with the higher compression? you just have to use a higher octane fuel or pull a little more timeing out.
    i dont think that cam is the best choice for severaly reasons. first its a cam that was designed to work with fords factory fuel injection, so it leaves so potential on the table that can be had with a carb. second that cam seems a little big on the lift for use with those heads and intakes that your indicateing. 10 years ago i built a 351 for friends mustang. i used a lighting short block that svo was selling back then. then used performer rpm heads and intake. i put the ford f303 cam in it (not know what i know now). that motor was a monster. it was easly 425 hp, pulled up to 6000rpm with out a problem. one of the problems with the 351 is the large main beaing size results in high rpm oiling problems. the surface speed on the large journal can result in some problems when you start spinning the motor up. hope this is some good info that helps.
     
  3. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    There's nothing wrong with an X cam and a carb. I'm running the Z with carbs and I've run the B303 too, plus the F4TE roller. None leave anything on the table with a carb. In fact the F4TE works better than anything I've tried with a carb for a street cam. The B & Z are close behind it.
     
  4. mean_maverick

    mean_maverick Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,312
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Irvine, Kentucky
    Vehicle:
    '73 4dr
    just didnt run nitrous with that much compression. not to mention if i go flat top then ill prolly buy hyper pistons vs forged. not to mention with the runners of the heads, i didnt wanna get much above this type of cam

    that's kinda what i was thinking but ive been wrong before. i have a couple friends that run the FRPP cams with carbs and turn high 11's all day.


    not to mention, some of these parts are not se in stone. im just starting from the bottom and working my way up.

    thanks for the input guys :)
     
  5. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    Mean Maverick,
    Make a list of all the performance that you want:
    Speed, gear ratio, RPM, power, torque, tire size, weight of the car, power adders, and use - then you can make a more informed decision on what the engine internals should be. You know that you will be driving on the street, will there be highway driving too? What RPM will you (and your engine) be willing to tolerate cruising at 60-70 MPH?
    At the track you will want to go through the traps at your peak power RPM so tires and gearing has to meet the criteria to make that happen in conjunction with your cam. Try to keep in mind that you are combining several systems into complete system to make your goal work.
     
  6. brainsboy

    brainsboy Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Messages:
    774
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Location:
    Tampa
    Looks like a nice setup. Just curious why you didnt stroke it? With the cost of everything your not looking at very much more money to stroke it into a 408.
     
  7. mean_maverick

    mean_maverick Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,312
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Irvine, Kentucky
    Vehicle:
    '73 4dr
    thanks Paul. this car wont see much highway driving, well, nothing over 60 mph anyways. im going to be running a 3.50 gear and probably a 26" tire, all behind a C4.


    wanted to see what i could do with a stock bore 351 first, and wanted to keep the 4.000" bore for strength since the F4TE blocks are a "lighter" casting. if everything goes well down the road, i may go to an SVO block and run a 408 or 427. who knows what will happen between now and then :)
     
  8. M.A.V.

    M.A.V. Yep,my real initials.

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    2,909
    Likes Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Macon,Georgia
    Vehicle:
    1972 Grabber Maverick,1966 Fairlane GT Pro Street
    F4TE Blocks are strong enough to support 700 +/- Hp reliably. (My 408 will use one)

    The Large journal (big bearing) condition of the windsor is not a problem below 7000 rpm.

    While there are better options out there than the X-303 cam, if you already have one I think it would run Ok (my 308 has one in it :))
     
  9. bradleygt

    bradleygt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2008
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    grand rapids michigan
    Vehicle:
    1970 maverick
  10. PINKY

    PINKY .....John Ford.....

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    9,875
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Louisville, Ky.
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick
    compression sucks!
     
  11. Joe Dirt

    Joe Dirt BBF life

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    4,375
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    172
    Location:
    Cleveland, TN
    Vehicle:
    1970 ford torino #1
    x2

    ask my iron headed 429:rofl2:
     
  12. mean_maverick

    mean_maverick Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,312
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Irvine, Kentucky
    Vehicle:
    '73 4dr

    which sucks..... more compression or less? and why?
     
  13. mean_maverick

    mean_maverick Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    7,312
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Irvine, Kentucky
    Vehicle:
    '73 4dr

    i have heard about this setup before but im iffy about everything working together. have u run this yourself? or have any more informaiton on it???
     
  14. Bryant

    Bryant forgot more than learned

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    6,538
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    203
    Garage:
    1
    Location:
    San Diego
    Vehicle:
    71 Maverick
    im not saying that ford letter cams are bad for carbs. i run the f cam in my 302 it runs stong. i ran that cam because i had it laying around. a carb can run a more agressive cam than the letter cams. if you have the cam allready then by all means use it, just make sure you get matching valve springs on what ever heads you choose for what ever cam you use.
     
  15. baddad457

    baddad457 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    5,861
    Likes Received:
    141
    Trophy Points:
    171
    Location:
    Opelousas La.
    There's really no point in running a more agressive cam in a street motor with a carb. The EFI grinds offer more than just performance with a carb, cleaner idle& emissions, smoother powerband, better throttle response. No reason not to use one with a carb. I'm running the F4TE cam with 1.7 rockers in the 5.0 in my 89 Ranger with a 4 speed. If I didn't tell you it had a carb, you'd never guess it. Powerband is from idle all the way to 6000. Starts & idles with no choke down to 25*F
     

Share This Page