c4 or c6

Discussion in 'General Maverick/Comet' started by HOMERMAV, Nov 2, 2008.

  1. HOMERMAV

    HOMERMAV Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Messages:
    1,439
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NW.OHIO
    Vehicle:
    1971 MAVERICK
    dont know what i should buy to put behind the 1989 5.0 motor c4 or c6

    thanks john
     
  2. Mavman72

    Mavman72 Gone backwards but lookin' forward

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    6,759
    Likes Received:
    272
    Trophy Points:
    273
    Location:
    Buffalo N.Y.
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick 2 door.Original V-8 3 spd std shift.Also a 72 one owner Sprint sporting a 351 Windsor
    Go with the C-4,Smaller,lighter,cheaper,just as reliable when built properly.
     
  3. newtoford

    newtoford Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,475
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    157
    Location:
    New Castle Delaware
    Vehicle:
    '76 Maverick, '76 Comet, 78 Monte Carlo, '85 Cutlass Supreme, '86 Regal Limited, '87 Grand Prix
    yea, what he said
     
  4. RobertBailey

    RobertBailey MCCI & MCG Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    809
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    92
    Location:
    Lenoir City, Tennessee
    Vehicle:
    1972 Grabber Clone,1970 Maverick, 1973 Grabber, 1973 2dr, 1973 Maverick(Parts Car) 2000 Ford SD Truck PowerStroke
    c6 wont fit...tried it back in the 80's
    robert
     
  5. HOMERMAV

    HOMERMAV Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Messages:
    1,439
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    NW.OHIO
    Vehicle:
    1971 MAVERICK
    c4 it is

    im going to a super ford swap meet in columbus ohio thankgiving week end
    so i will look for one then
    thanks for the help.
    john
     
  6. PINKY

    PINKY .....John Ford.....

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2002
    Messages:
    9,875
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Louisville, Ky.
    Vehicle:
    1970 Ford Maverick
    there will likely be a few board members at the swap meet as well. We go every year. I will/was gonna make a post about it in a week or so. I plan on going Saturday. We usually meet for breakfast then go to the swap.
    Maybe you can/would join us.
     
  7. Craig Selvey

    Craig Selvey Indiana State Rep - MCCI

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    18,313
    Likes Received:
    1,374
    Trophy Points:
    878
    Location:
    Albany, Indiana
    Vehicle:
    1972 Maverick Grabber - Color: Orange Also, 1976 Ford Maverick 4-door, 1977 Mercury Comet 2-door.

    I will be at the swap meet as well. I can bring you a c4 tranny if you want. Email me directly (see below) if I can help.
     
  8. Blackdog455

    Blackdog455 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maple Valley, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 ford Maverick
    i thought the c-6 was lighter and all that.
     
  9. CaptainComet

    CaptainComet Large Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    Messages:
    5,004
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    438
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    Vehicle:
    72 Comet
    C6 is bigger and takes more HP to turn over.

    C4s can be built to take up to 800 HP if done right.

    Very little reason to go to a C6 in a light car anymore.
     
  10. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    C4s are built to take 1000 HP and more.
    800 Hp can be done with stock parts in most cases.
     
  11. Blackdog455

    Blackdog455 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maple Valley, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 ford Maverick
    wow...didnt the c6 come after the c4?
     
  12. ratio411

    ratio411 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    6,060
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Pensacola
    Vehicle:
    1972 Sprint and 1975 Maverick
    C4 = 64 and C6 = 66, so 2 years apart.

    The C4 was designed for low power and/or lightweight vehicles.
    The C6 was for heavy cars, big engines, towing, and trucks.

    The C6 is a very strong tranny just as is. While the C4 is a pretty weak tranny in stock form. Used to be that folks would swap to the C6 to get strength, and just kinda deal with the weight and size.

    Over the years though, the aftermarket has developed parts for the C4 to give it tremendous strength.

    So, before the aftermarket stepped in, the C6 was the answer when you needed a strong tranny. If the C6 didn't soak up so very much horsepower and wasn't so heavy, the C4 probably would never have received attention from the aftermarket.
     
  13. Blackdog455

    Blackdog455 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maple Valley, WA
    Vehicle:
    1971 ford Maverick
    ahhh sweet. Glad to know!
     
  14. PaulS

    PaulS Member extrordiare

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,858
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle area
    Vehicle:
    1966 Mustang, 1972, 73, 73 and 73 Mavericks
    The C4, in stock form was used behind engines as small as 1600 CC 4 cylinders and as large as four barrel 351 Winsor engines in 69 mustangs. In stock condition it can handle 350 Ft. Lbs. of torque.
    The only aftermarket parts that I use are in engines producing 600 HP and up. I do modify the number of clutches, lubrication, cooling and valve body circuits for up to 500 HP but no "after-market" parts are needed until you need an input shaft that will take more than 600 HP. The factory hardened shaft will easily handle 500 Hp.

    There are lots of myths about the C4 but the simple truth is that any C4 from 1971 on that has the 5 clutch plates in the forward clutch and 4 clutches in the direct clutch can be used as is with a shift kit and some minor mods with engines that produce up to 400 - 450 HP and torque - even with the "soft" input shaft.

    The C4 is a great small transmission that can handle the bulk of the small block street performance cars that were built in the 70s and 80s.
     
  15. wardf

    wardf Ward Frahler

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    Messages:
    1,964
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    146
    Location:
    Elizabethtown, Ky.
    Vehicle:
    70 maverick
    Paul, I saw a c-4 behind a 390 in a stock LTD or Galaxie in the wrecking yard once, stock bell housing and all. And no is was not the FMX it was a c-4, I almost bought it because I had never seen one before and I used to be into FE motors, but I had long since moved on to SB's by this time.
     

Share This Page